Revisiting my responses from “The Hawk” by Brian Doyle and “Joy” by Zadie Smith, I was disappointed and pleased with myself. Why both? You might ask. Well I am disappointed in the way I used to answer questions, clearly lacking specificity. I would answer the questions with a summary rather than analyzing the questions and using my own voice. However, I am pleased with how far I have come since then. More recently, my answers in response to “Joy” offer more detail and analysis of the piece. Answering the questions with my own voice and quotes from the source, rather than a brief summary. During the first essay it was difficult to gather my ideas to support my argument, but by writing in more detail and using critical thinking in my responses I was able to transfer over some of my ideas easier during the second essay. Not only have I noticed a difference in my responses but I have developed my annotation skills tremendously. Annotation being a key difference in my writing process between essay one and two. When I first began with Becoming a Writer, I would circle or write in the margin when I noticed something, causing my annotations to not be scattered all over the place. Now, after learning about different annotation styles such as understanding, rhetorical, questioning, and exploring relationships, I am able to think more critically about what I am reading. Using those annotation styles allows me as a reader to bookmark key information for reading responses and contribute more to class discussions.




Leave a Reply